-homepage- -about us- -e-essays- -shat"zposts- -sitra
achra- -lofty
esoteric knowledge- |
paschal diary 24/06/23: tel aviv queer frankist intellecual scene, neshamology and radical monotheism |
post by gur dimei
over the past thursday I had a meeting with an editor of a prestiguous transgressive magazine in israel which publishes mostly homosexual transgressive writings. we met in tel aviv at some cafe. he told me that my theologico-pornographic-holocaust-fanfics are an expression of total monotheism which is pure solar anal anarchy. in my fanfics God/shoresh commits unspeakable sexual violence against himself and against the world and against mashiach. I explained to that editor that it is the lawlessness and absolute grace with no dinim of yeshu in the highest and most inner core of divine totalizations, and exposed to him the secret of TzV”I=TzOA”H as well as TzV”I=2×M”B. I was thinking about what he’s told me, that I’m actually a radical fundamentalist rapist monotheist and it is actually true, that shabbateanism is true monotheism and that the inevitable consequence of divine authority is divine break, a violent self-dismembering-and-innerly-creating discharge, a rather unique corpo-sexual madness.
later on thursday, I went to a party of chaim luski, a former disciple of deleuze who used to be a professor in the israeli academy but got expelled due to a [[[sex scandal]]]. he was the person who connected me with the transgressive magazine’s editor and he is a very nice and kind person (unlike how he is portrayed in the israeli media). yesterday, which was a day later, we convened to read the schelling freiheitsschrift together. I stressed how schelling portrays something near to a parody of spinoza’s substance in his portrayal of “pure necessity” as lifeless and mechanic. instead of the supposed substantial self-motionlessness of spinozic metaphysics, schelling poses the “living God” who committs to a “free creation” as an “act” of “reproduction”. hence, schelling contrasts the anal procedure (selfish-particular will) with the vaginal procedure (reproductive-universal will) which is the affirmation of the divine narrative and an agent of the personalization, history, and becoming-absolute-spirit of man. but in fact, schelling is not this far from spinoza/hegel, as substance is not necessary lifeless, be it changeless. life is essential development, not merely personalizing exteriorization, and it is possible to reproduce within yourself, in a process of auto-production, within the margins of immanent divine self-provident trinitarian historicity. the differences between hegel and schelling are not that major as academics like to portray them. |
On the Author: Gur Dimei is an Israeli ''Frankist Incel'', sha''tzposter and an independent researcher of the Zohar. |