-homepage- -about us- -e-essays- -shat"zposts- -sitra
achra- -lofty
esoteric knowledge- |
SKR 29/06/23: neshamic post-demiurgic procedures and the hylomorphic and total trinities |
post by gur dimei
in previous posts I have shown that amira”h (and particularly his first name – shem ShaBTa”Y) is an organ with demiurgic qualities. in fact, he is what I started to call “the second demiurge”, which completes and perfects the initial flawed creation of his interiority, and thus – a growing demiurge, a growing theo-morphist. in my shabbatean theory, sha”tz is our ChaBa”D – chochma, binah and da’at. this trinity is what I like to call the hylomorphic trinity, which is composed of golem (pre-existent materia, ChoChM”A = GoLe”M), tziur (enforming agent, a dividing and personalizing understanding – binah) and neshama (the total and full consummation proceeding from the phallo-vaginal procedure of ChU”B [chochma u’vina]). this trinity is basically the intellectual trinity of the ancients – of plato, aristotle, solomon, etc. the trinity which brings god forth out of himself, by the way of intuition/generation or basically – concept, which is made of hylic limitless thought and formal absolute understanding, turning into a neshamic act. come and see, they are three nishmatin [“spirits”] [...] one is the nishmeta of all nishmatin [...] now other nishmeta is a nukva hidden within her potencies, and she is their nishmeta [“spirit”], and from them the body is inclined to reveal her avideta [“procedure”] to the entire world. as a gufa [“carnal construct”] which is a mana [“vessel/receptacle”] for the nishmeta to process its procedures in it. we can say that while the hylomorphic trinity is marginal/formative/generative, the total trinity is pleromatic/totalizing/procedural. the latter is focused on the completion, perfection and self-realization of divine procedural activity (avideta), and in that sense it is particularly binatic, post-demiurgic and eschatological in nature. these two trinities are different modes of divine activity – the first is initial/secondary, while the second is eschatic/primary. they are two triangles composing the same star of david, they are both modes of bringing forth in the divine corpus. to hear more about my shabbatean theology come to holzer books (jaffa street 91, jerusalem) in the coming two mondays (on 03/06/23 and 10/06/23) at 20:00. I am conducting a modernist shabbatean reading of hegel’s lectures on religion and R’ Natan’s sefer habria.
|
On the Author: Gur Dimei is an Israeli ''Frankist Incel'', sha''tzposter and an independent researcher of the Zohar. |