What's up my fellow tikkuncels and white e-frankists. In recent days I have begun delving again into the wicked, awful scholar Pierre Teilhard De Chardin (after his name was mentioned in Leo Zagami’s book Confessions of an Illuminati, which documents the evildoings of the Jesuit-Mason axis). I remember that, back in the day, I was fond of Teilhard. Why? Because he has an incredibly good prose. And I usually judge writers according to their prose. Shouldn't I?. But the problem is that Teilhard, as I am noticing now, also explicitly talks about bio-engineering, climate engineering, and even the manipulation and engineering of the physical constitution of the universe – from the complexion of elements and temperatures in physical things, to the very constitution of space-time complex (!!!!). I learned to understand that Teilhard wasn’t writing about these stuff simply as “prose” (as would a person like Hegel write about the elevation of humanity into godhood), but rather as a manual!..
I want you to understand that we are being ruled by SEELE from Neon Genesis Evangelion, and they are working toward a Human Instrumentality Project. The term instrumentality is frequently used in documents of the American Teilhard Association, a think tank pushing for the manipulation of organic nature into assuming divine capacities, while losing its human traits and markers of personality.
Instrumentality is an ancient rabbinic concept. You will frequently hear Rabbis talking about how “a man should turn himself into God’s vessel”. But its also a metaphysical concept – tékhne. This rabbinic-metaphysical concept sees production as conditioned with the carrying-forth of matter by a prosthesis (relating to matter in the manner in which a woman relates to a man, or the way in which a body relates to its soul). Turning ourselves into vessels of the divine is not necessarily evil or “promethean” (Jason Reza Jorjani would claim that Plato, Zoroaster and Moses initiated Kabbalah so that humanity may evolve into a posture of godhood through the development of modern technology) – as long as we are not destroying nature or losing our markers of humanity, individuality and personality. But our rulers want to turn Earth into a “show”, a “performance art” or a “gigantic orgy” in which all humans will coagulate and merge into a collective unit, like in the book “Childhood’s End” by Arthur C. Clarke. This is more terrifying than you can imagine, because it simply means death and destruction of everything you know.
Deleuze and Guattari have famously critiqued Teilhardian notion of “convergence” and “centred-complexity”. Let’s quote them:

It is difficult to elucidate the system of the strata [*Gur note: strata are “laminations” of life] without seeming to introduce a kind of cosmic or even spiritual evolution from one to the other, as if they were arranged in stages and ascended degrees of perfection. Nothing of the sort. The different figures of content and expression are not stages. There is no biosphere or noosphere, but everywhere the same Mechanosphere.

And:

It [ecumenical organization] does not proceed by progressive homoge-nization, or by totalization, but by the taking on of consistency or the consolidation of the diverse as such.

First of all, I have tons of respect and appreciation for Justin Murphy who wrote the very stylistic book Based Deleuze, but there are couple of points that I would love for him to have expressed regarding “Deleuzian Conservatism”. The first is Deleuze’s intimacy with old scholastic theology – from Chartres through Cusa, to Duns Scotus – as well as the Mystical-Christian Leibnitz and Bruno, etc.. The second – and more important – is his opposition to Teilhardian “cosmic homogenization”.
Deleuze’s affirmation of diversity gives place for radical individualism, as opposed to the technological hivemind tyranny pushed for by the Jesuit-Masonry axis. People – mainly leftists – misconceive Deleuze’s “anarchism” as communistic, while it is in essence libertarian (and capitalistic, as Mr. Murphy shows). The rebellion of D&G against Teilhard is a rebellion against the “theological” (but really dark-qabalistic) absorption of humanity into Godhood – against welding together all individuals into an homogeneous system or “noetic organism” and against destroying nature generally and human nature particularly for the sake of the promethean elevation of Earth.
Instead, D&G offer us with a “plane of consistency”, where things are released to their singular personalities and personal domains of self-creation. This affirmation of diversity first of all affirms natality – the unique, unrepeatable nature of each human, of each expression of life. In my opinion, as the leftist-masonic-jesuit tyranny takes on Teilhard as its oracle, the inevitable is that conservatives will embrace Teilhard’s greatest critic – Deleuze.